作业帮 > 英语 > 作业

英语翻译DiscussionBoth ATTA scores—Creative Ability and Creativi

来源:学生作业帮 编辑:搜狗做题网作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/05/12 15:15:01
英语翻译
Discussion
Both ATTA scores—Creative Ability and Creativity Level—proved to be adequate predictors of creative performance as measured by Campaign Creativity.The unadjusted validity coefficients of .59 and .56 are comparable to the average validity coefficient of I.Q.predicting job performance as reported in the literature (see Hunter & Hunter,1984).Of practical importance,the results suggest that using the ATTA Creative Ability measure alone (subskills only,and thus briefer to score) is sufficient.On the other hand,the ATC Creative Ability measure was not a good predictor.In light of the distinction pointed out by Arthur and Villado
,it seems likely that the ATC and the ATTA are measuring the same construct—creative ability—but that the self-rating method of the ATC is much less predictively valid.Accordingly,in Study 2,we proceeded only with the ATTA.
英语翻译DiscussionBoth ATTA scores—Creative Ability and Creativi
根据创造力竞选活动(组织)的测量,ATTA点数(就是创造力)和创造力水平两个都能足够预测创造绩效.0.59和0.56,这两个未经调整的有效系数可以说能与在1984年出版的《hunter&hunter》文献中IQ智商绩效预测工作中得出的平均有效系数相比拟.更有现实意义的是,该结果指示仅仅使用ATTA的创造能力测量方法(只测量次级技能,这样打分的时候更简单)就已足够.另一方面,ATC创造能力测量方法却不是一个好的预测方法.鉴于Arthur和Villado(应该是两个人或两个组织或杂志之类的)指出的区别,尽管ATC和ATTA是在测量创造力这同一个概念,但ATC的自我评估法与ATTA相比似乎更不具预测的有效性.在第二个阶段的研究里面,我们只使用ATTA方法.
再问: 非常感谢。基本符合。